![]() Same with the inbuilt ATC vs online ATC networks etc? But when there’s a high quality third party add-on readily available, which, by the sound of it, does a particular job better than the existing inbuilt solution, does that dissuade you at all from spending time on further development for that part of the sim? I recall that you have stated on a number of occasions that the fog problem is one which you guys are intending to address at some stage. I’m just curious because the SkyMaxx Pro developers, on their blog, have said that they have worked closely with you on the product. ![]() I see Skymaxx Pro as taking a very different approach to clouds than what we use – we looked at multiple third party cloud engines during v10 dev and picked the solution we ship now. That decision was partly a technical and business decision, but it’s also partly aesthetic. Therefore it doesn’t surprise me that we get two very different responses on weather. Some users love our weather and don’t see any value to SkyMaxx Pro. Other users love Skymaxx Pro, were never happy with our weather, and now consider what we did obsolete. So I don’t see Skymaxx Pro as taking the pressure off of us to fix bugs in our own weather system rather I see them reaching an audience that didn’t like the ‘what’ of what we coded, not the ‘how’.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |